Answer & Explanation:All the details in PDFPlz do the same Steps
assignment_1_cw1__individual.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Entrepreneurship and New Venture Creation – BUSS 1011- Summer– 16 – CW1–QP
In Semester Coursework 1-Summer 2016
Individual project -Entrepreneurial Role Model
Module: Entrepreneurship and New Venture Creation – BUSS 1011
Max. Marks: 40
Level: 2
Duration: 1 week
Instructions:
Follow the guidelines carefully before starting the project.
Submission is in week 2
Task: Identifying an entrepreneurial role model in Oman
This is an assignment to identify an entrepreneurial role model from Oman and to study his/her
venture. You need to study the venture in a group of maximum of 5 students.
Guidelines:
Please select a start-up company of your choice and write a report about the founder(s), nature
of the business, why you admire it and what you can learn from it and the founder(s). Roughly,
the report should address the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Origin of the company.
Person(s) behind the venture and interesting attributes
The unique value proposition and/or innovation.
Growth Story: Progress, success, failure and milestones. .
Lessons you have learnt (including how the venture may have impacted Omani economy).
Please feel free to address any other observation or learning if you wish. Limit your report to a
maximum of 4 pages (font size 12), and submit through Moodle.
BUSS 1011 (QP)
Page 1 of 4
Entrepreneurship and New Venture Creation – BUSS 1011- Summer– 16 – CW1–QP
Marks allotment:
Structure of the article
Cover page with name and id of students and
session name
Introduction
Origin of the company
Person(s) behind the venture and interesting
attributes
The unique value proposition and or
innovation
Growth Story: Progress, success, failure and
milestones.
Lessons you have learnt
Conclusion
Reference
Appendix
Total
Marks allotted
N/A
2
3
2
2
3
5
2
1
N/A
20
Plagiarism
As per MEC policy, any form of violation of academic integrity will invite severe penalty.
Plagiarised documents, in part or in whole, submitted by the students will be subject to this policy.
A. First offence of plagiarism
a. A student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once, within a maximum period of one
week. However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work
will be imposed.
b. Mark deduction: When the work is resubmitted, the marking will be undertaken according to
the marking criteria. In compliance with this policy, the 25% deduction is then made on the marks
obtained. For example, in an assessment that carries a maximum of 50 marks, suppose a student
were to obtain 30 marks for the resubmitted work, the final marks for that assessment will be 22.5
(after deducting 25% of the marks actually obtained for the resubmitted work).
BUSS 1011 (QP)
Page 2 of 4
Entrepreneurship and New Venture Creation – BUSS 1011- Summer– 16 – CW1–QP
c. Period of resubmission: The student will have to resubmit the work one week from the date he
or she is advised to resubmit. For example, if the formal advice to resubmit was communicated to
the student on a Sunday (latest by 5 pm), the student will have to resubmit the work latest by next
Sunday 5 pm.
d. If the re-submitted work is also detected to be plagiarized, then the work will be awarded a zero.
e. Resubmission of the work beyond the maximum period of one week will not be accepted and
the work will be awarded a zero.
B. Any further offence of plagiarism
a. If any student is again caught in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (either in the
same module, same semester or in any other semester), the student will directly be awarded zero
for the work in which plagiarism is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work.
C. Guidelines
a. Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at
different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the
whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be
resubmitted.
b. Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be
considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on
account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students.
c. Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or
part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment (assignment), the deduction
in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or
part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as
BUSS 1011 (QP)
Page 3 of 4
Entrepreneurship and New Venture Creation – BUSS 1011- Summer– 16 – CW1–QP
having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act
of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all the students of the group.
d. Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of components
or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an
individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable:
1. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be
considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of whether plagiarism is on
account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students
of the group. In such cases the group assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy.
2. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment
component will be resubmitted as per the policy. The policy will then be applied to that student
alone.
3. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment
(assignment).
D. Amount of similar material
a. The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from all sources put together
should not exceed 30% (including direct quotations).
b. The total amount of quoted material (direct quotations) in any form of student work from all
sources put together should not exceed 10%.
c. The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from a single source should
not exceed 7 percent. However, cases having a similarity of less than 7 percent in such cases may
still be investigated by the faculty depending on the seriousness of the case. d. If faculty member
find enough merit in the case of a student work with a similarity (with a single source) of more
than 7 percent as not a case of plagiarism, the faculty member should provide detailed
comments/remarks to justify the case.
BUSS 1011 (QP)
Page 4 of 4
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
